Cybersecurity researchers have found critical security flaws in
two popular industrial remote access systems that can be exploited
to ban access to industrial production floors, hack into company
networks, tamper with data, and even steal sensitive business
secrets.
The flaws, discovered[1] by Tel Aviv-based
OTORIO, were identified in B&R Automation’s SiteManager and
GateManager, and MB Connect Line’s mbCONNECT24, two of the popular
remote maintenance tools used in automotive, energy, oil & gas,
metal, and packaging sectors to connect to industrial assets from
anywhere across the world.
Six Flaws in B&R Automation’s SiteManager and
GateManager
According to an advisory[2] published by the US
Cybersecurity and infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) on
Wednesday, successful exploitation of the B&R Automation
vulnerabilities could allow for “arbitrary information disclosure,
manipulation, and a denial-of-service condition.”
The flaws, ranging from path traversal to improper
authentication, impact all versions of SiteManager prior to
v9.2.620236042, GateManager 4260, and 9250 before v9.0.20262, and
GateManager 8250 prior to v9.2.620236042.
OTORIO’s Nikolay Sokolik and Hay Mizrachi found that by
exploiting these six vulnerabilities (CVE-2020-11641 through
CVE-2020-11646), an authenticated attacker with access to the
solution via a general license could view sensitive information
about other users, their assets, and their processes, even when
they belong to a different organization from that of the
adversary.
“This information can be used by attackers to target other
organizations and their industrial systems,” OTORIO said.
“Additionally, hackers can fool users into malicious foreign
sites through fake system messages and alerts. The attacker can
also trigger a repeated restart of both the GateManager and the
SiteManager, leading eventually to a loss of availability and halt
production.”
An RCE Flaw in mbCONNECT24
Likewise, mymbCONNECT24 and mbCONNECT24 versions v2.6.1 and
prior have been found vulnerable to four different security
issues[3] that could make it
possible for a logged-in attacker to access arbitrary information
via SQL injection, steal session details by carrying out a
cross-site request forgery (CSRF[4]) attack with merely a
specifically crafted link, and leverage outdated and unused
third-party libraries bundled with the software to gain remote code
execution.
The RCE vulnerability is the severest of all, with a CVSS score
of 9.8 out of a maximum of 10.
Although these flaws have since been fixed, the development is
another reminder of how weaknesses in remote access solutions can
have destructive consequences on critical infrastructure.
For its part, CISA has recommended minimizing network exposure
for all control system devices, in addition to putting control
system networks and remote devices behind firewalls, and isolating
them from the business network.
“When remote access is required, use secure methods, such as
Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), recognizing that VPNs may
have vulnerabilities[5] and should be
updated to the most current version available,” the agency
cautioned. Also, recognize that VPN is only as secure as the
connected devices.”
References
- ^
discovered
(www.otorio.com) - ^
advisory
(us-cert.cisa.gov) - ^
four different security issues
(us-cert.cisa.gov) - ^
CSRF
(en.wikipedia.org) - ^
VPNs may have vulnerabilities
(thehackernews.com)
Read more http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheHackersNews/~3/bj3b3xlIG7o/industrial-remote-access.html

